Blog Article

What’s so tricky about IFRS 17?

Tuesday 19 March 2019

Opening comments

There have been more than a few eye-catching headliners around about IFRS 17 – "a whole new perspective", "a game changer", "a light shining through darkness", "the dawn of a new era" - all of which, of course, are true.

Applicable from 1 January 2022, IFRS 17 is a big, new standard for a very big and very old and very multi-national industry. It will change fundamentally the way most insurers report their financial results (for a given period and over time). After investing 20 or so years of development effort into IFRS 17, the IASB are highly confident in their expectation that it will bring greater transparency and comparability in financial reporting by insurers. In particular, the requirement to report the insurance and financial result separately will result in insurers telling a more complete story about their financial performance and in so doing provide analysts and others with better information about the overall quality of their earnings.

Having said all that we will now briefly enter the numerical world of IFRS 17, see what it is all about and then use this as the context for highlighting some of the trickier areas that will arise in practice.

The IFRS 17 general model

IFRS 17 applies a general accounting model for insurance contracts. To see how different this is compared to existing practice let us consider the following illustration.

Insco (which has a 31/12 year end) issues a group of insurance contracts on 1st January 20X3.

Insco (which has a 31/12 year end) issues a group of insurance contracts on 1st January 20X3.

  • Coverage period is 3 years starting 1st January 20X3
  • Premiums are £220 per annum all to be paid on 1st January 20X3
  • Expected claims are £160 per annum

Claims of £20, £90 and £190 were paid in 20X3, 20X4 and 20X5 respectively.

Claims of £20, £90 and £190 were paid in 20X3, 20X4 and 20X5 respectively.

Existing accounting practice will usually spread the premium income over the coverage period with a diminishing unearned premium liability reported in the balance sheet. Claims incurred are expensed in profit or loss so as to match them with the premium income faithfully following accountants’ dear old friend the "accruals concept".

Statement of profit or loss
  20X3 20X4 20X5
  £ £ £
Earned premiums 220 220 220
Claims expense (20) (90) (190)
Net profit 200 130 30


Balance sheet liability (X3 to X5)
1/1/X3 B/fwd 0
X3 Cash (660)
  P&l revenue 220
31/12/X3   (440)
X4 P&l revenue 220
31/12/X4   (220)
X5 P&l revenue 220
31/12/X5 C/fwd 0


What IFRS 17 does at first instance is to introduce more transparency by identifying and reporting the component parts of the liability (often called its "building blocks") and how revenue from them is recognised in profit or loss. The gateway to an understanding of these building blocks is to think for a moment about how (rationally) we could price the InsCo premium. There will be three elements to this:

  1. The net cash outflow - we estimate we will have to pay out £480.
  2. The non-financial risk adjustment – the above £480 is a huge "guesstimate". Rationally we estimate that we should charge the customer a further £42 for us to accept the variability inherent in the net cash outflow estimate.
  3. The contract service margin - we would like to make £138 profit on this group of contracts.

The premium will therefore be priced £660 (480 + 42 + 138). The "building blocks" on initial recognition of this group of contracts on at 1st January 20X3 will therefore be:

Net cash flow [NCF](660 – 480) 180
Non-financial risk adjustment [NFRA] (42)
Contractual service margin [CSM] (138)
Initial liability 0

On 1st January 20X3 these will be recorded in a liability for remaining coverage (LRC) account together with the premiums received.

  £ £ £ £
1/1/X3 - - - -
New contracts 180 (42) (138) -
Cash (660)     (660)
LCR c/fwd (480) (42) (138) (660)

Note above how the model breaks the insurance liability out into its component parts. It will now amortise these through profit or loss over the coverage period (on a straight line basis for simplicity’s sake) breaking down the revenue into its component parts.

Liability for remaining coverage NCF NFRA CSM Total
  £ £ £ £
1/1/X3 - - - -
New contracts 180 (42) (138) -
Cash (660)     (660)
  (480) (42) (138) (660)
X3 – P&L 160 14 46 220
31/12/X3 (320) (28) (92) (440)
X4 – P&L 160 14 46 220
31/12/X4 (160) (14) (46) (220)
X5 – P&L 160 14 46 220
31/12/X5 0 0 0 0


Statement of profit or loss 20X3 20X4 20X5
  £ £ £
Insurance revenue      
To cover claims 160 160 160
Amortisation of NFRA 14 14 14
Recognition of CSM 46 46 46
  220 220 220
Insurance expense      
Claims expense 20 90 190
Other expenses - - -
  (20) (90) (190)
Insurance result 200 130 30


Using the above as a context setter let’s now think about potential tricky areas. I have constructed a league table which ranks and briefly explains some of these.

Six tricky areas

No 1 – Fog factor

A major challenge in applying IFRS 17 is to try and translate it into plain language with clear worked examples. The standard and its illustrative examples could be much more helpful in this respect. IFRS 16 on lease accounting does a much better job of this.

No 2 – The time value of money

Insurers will issue contracts with long coverage periods giving rise to very long term liabilities. Consistent with defined benefit pension liability and long term loan accounting, the future cash flows must be discounted to present value and the finance cost (the unwinding of the discount) expensed in profit or loss below the insurance result each year. This is a BIG change for most insurers. What is more it is a fertile area for more tricky issues such as how to identify an appropriate discount rate and how to account for the impact of changes in it over the coverage period.

No 3 – Estimating the net cash flows

The longer the coverage period the more of a "guesstimate" this will be. Insurers will have to review their estimation methodology and develop and disclose a quality framework for future cash flow estimation. Furthermore these must be re-estimated at each year end and the CSM adjusted. If the changes are very adverse the CSM could be wiped out and then provision will have to be made immediately in full for a loss component.

No 4 – Reinsurance

Talking to insurers around the world an increasing number are expressing concern about how to apply IFRS 17 in this area. Generally the standard requires the net reinsurance cost to be spread over the coverage period and the cost of claims to be abated by the amount reinsured. The time value of money and cash flow estimation issues will apply here. For proportional reinsurance the numbers will for the most part be a straight % of the amounts pertaining to the insurance contracts issued. However this will not be the case with non-proportional and excess of loss reinsurance.

No 5 – Some light relief – the premium allocation approach (PAA)

The building blocks approach is a tad heavy handed for short duration insurance contracts with coverage periods typically of one year or less. IFRS 17 permits the use of the much simplified PAA for these. The resulting numbers are very similar to existing accounting practice although discounting will be required for such contracts with a financing component.

No 6 – The unit of account

The IFRS 17 rules will be applied to groups of contracts and not individual ones. This involves firstly identifying portfolios of contracts and then allocating the contracts within each portfolio to time buckets often called cohorts. Insurers must not include contracts issued more than one year apart in the same cohort. The reason for this is to ensure that low margin years are not hidden within good margin years and so lessen the usefulness of trend information. Cohorts will be divided into three groups reflecting the extent to which they are or could become onerous. The accounting rules are applied to each group.

Other problem areas include how to:

√ identify insurance contracts and the unbundling of non-insurance elements;

√ account for contracts with participation features;

√ apply the transitional rules;

√ assemble the data necessary to construct the extensive disclosures required by the standard.

IFRS 17 Insurance Contract Accounting Workshop 2019 (3 days)

We have a busy IFRS 17 training schedule this year, starting in London later this year. To join us, book here, or contact our friendly Customer Service Team.

27 Mar 2019 London
19 Jun 2019 London
24 Jun 2019 Miami
16 Sep 2019 Toronto
18 Sep 2019 London
4 Dec 2019 Zurich

If you have any questions about this course or would like to discuss other dates, or an In-House course, contact our friendly Customer Service Team today!

About the Author

Related Articles

Weekly Catch-Up 3rd October

In response to amendments made to the IFRS 17 standard by the International Accounting Standards Boa...

Read More >

Weekly Catch-Up 29th August

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued a proposal which offers insurers an extra year t...

Read More >

Weekly Catch-Up 13th February

A new campaign by the UK government called Flag it up, is being used to promote best practice in ant...

Read More >

Weekly Catch-Up 25th January

The IASB have targeted three main areas for improvement for IFRS 17 in their January board meeting. ...

Read More >

What’s so tricky about IFRS 17?

There have been more than a few eye-catching headliners around about IFRS 17 – “a whole new perspe...

Read More >

Stay Updated with IASeminars

Join 20,000+ other professionals on our global mailing list.